Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof

  Kommission / Italien

  Vertragsverletzung eines Mitgliedstaats - Artikel 28 EG - Freier Warenverkehr - Nationale Regelung, mit der das Ziehen von Anhängern durch Kleinkrafträder verboten wird - Mengenmäßige Beschränkungen - Maßnahmen gleicher Wirkung - Rechtfertigung - Sicherheit des ...

• EU-Kommission

  Kommission / Italien

  Vertragsverletzung eines Mitgliedstaats - Artikel 28 EG - Freier Warenverkehr - Nationale Regelung, mit der das Ziehen von Anhängern durch Kleinkrafträder verboten wird - Mengenmäßige Beschränkungen - Maßnahmen gleicher Wirkung - Rechtfertigung - Sicherheit des ...

• EU-Kommission

  Kommission / Italien

Verfahrensgang

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 05.10.2006 - C-110/05
• EuGH, 07.03.2007 - C-110/05
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 08.07.2008 - C-110/05
• EuGH, 10.02.2009 - C-110/05

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EuGH, 04.05.2017 - C-13/16

  Rigas satiksme - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Richtlinie 95/46/EG - Art. 7 …

  Auszug aus Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 05.10.2006 - C-110/05

  In that regard, Article 7(f) of Directive 95/46 lays down three cumulative conditions in order for the processing of personal data to be lawful, namely, first, the pursuit of a legitimate interest by the data controller or by the third party or parties to whom the data are disclosed; secondly, the need to process personal data for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued; and thirdly, that the fundamental rights and freedoms of the person concerned by the data protection do not take precedence over the legitimate interest pursued (judgment of 4 May 2017, Rigas satiksme , C-13/16, EU:C:2017:336, paragraph 28).

  As regards the second condition laid down in Article 7(f) of Directive 95/46, relating to the need to process personal data for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued, the Court has pointed out that derogations and limitations in relation to the protection of personal data must apply only in so far as is strictly necessary (judgment of 4 May 2017, Rigas satiksme , C-13/16, EU:C:2017:336, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited).

  It is also apparent from the case-law of the Court that it is possible to take into consideration, for the purposes of that balancing, the fact that the seriousness of the infringement of the data subject's fundamental rights resulting from that processing can vary depending on the possibility of accessing the data at issue in public sources (see, to that effect, judgment of 4 May 2017, Rigas satiksme , C-13/16, EU:C:2017:336, paragraph 32).

• EuGH, 19.10.2016 - C-582/14

  Breyer - Der Betreiber einer Website kann ein berechtigtes Interesse daran haben, …

  Auszug aus Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 05.10.2006 - C-110/05

  The Member States cannot add new principles relating to the lawfulness of the processing of personal data in that article or impose additional requirements that have the effect of amending the scope of one of the six principles provided for in that article (judgment of 19 October 2016, Breyer , C-582/14, EU:C:2016:779, paragraph 57).

  Thus, Member States cannot definitively prescribe, for certain categories of personal data, the result of the balancing of the opposing rights and interests, without allowing a different result by virtue of the particular circumstances of an individual case (judgment of 19 October 2016, Breyer , C-582/14, EU:C:2016:779, paragraph 62).

• EuGH, 24.11.2011 - C-468/10

  ASNEF - Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten - Richtlinie 95/46/EG - Art. 7 …

  Auszug aus Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 05.10.2006 - C-110/05

  Secondly, by its first and second questions, Tribunalul Bucure?Ÿti (Regional Court, Bucharest, Romania) refers to Articles 8 and 52 of the Charter, taken in isolation or read in conjunction with Article 7(f) of Directive 95/46. The Court has made clear that the assessment of the condition laid down in that provision, relating to the existence of fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which override the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by the third party or parties to whom the data are disclosed, necessitates a balancing of the opposing rights and interests concerned which depends on the individual circumstances of the particular case in question, and in the context of which account must be taken of the significance of the data subject's rights arising from Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter (judgment of 24 November 2011, Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito , C-468/10 and C-469/10, EU:C:2011:777, paragraph 40).

  This more serious infringement of the data subject's rights enshrined in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter must be taken into account and be balanced against the legitimate interest pursued by the data controller or by the third party or parties to whom the data are disclosed (see, to that effect, judgment of 24 November 2011, Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito , C-468/10 and C-469/10, EU:C:2011:777, paragraph 45).

• EuGH, 11.12.2014 - C-212/13

  Die Richtlinie zum Schutz personenbezogener Daten ist auf die Videoaufzeichnung …

  Auszug aus Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 05.10.2006 - C-110/05

  It must be borne in mind that surveillance in the form of a video recording of persons, which is stored on a continuous recording device - the hard disk drive - constitutes, pursuant to Article 3(1) of Directive 95/46, the automatic processing of personal data (judgment of 11 December 2014, Rynes , C-212/13, EU:C:2014:2428, paragraph 25).

  In the present case, the objective which the controller essentially seeks to achieve when he or she installs a video surveillance system such as that at issue in the main proceedings, namely protecting the property, health and life of the co-owners of a building, is likely to be characterised as a "legitimate interest', within the meaning of Article 7(f) of Directive 95/46. The first condition laid down in that provision appears, therefore, in principle, to be fulfilled (see, by analogy, judgment of 11 December 2014, Rynes , C-212/13, EU:C:2014:2428, paragraph 34).

• EuGH, 13.05.2014 - C-131/12

  Der Betreiber einer Internetsuchmaschine ist bei personenbezogenen Daten, die auf …

  Auszug aus Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 05.10.2006 - C-110/05

  In addition, all processing of personal data must comply, first, with the principles relating to data quality set out in Article 6 of Directive 95/46 and, secondly, with one of the criteria for making data processing legitimate listed in Article 7 of that directive (judgment of 13 May 2014, Google Spain and Google , C-131/12, EU:C:2014:317, paragraph 71 and the case-law cited).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 13.12.2007 - C-265/06

  Kommission / Portugal - Vertragsverletzung eines Mitgliedstaats - Art. 226 EG - …

  Vgl. die Schlussanträge von Generalanwalt Léger vom 5. Oktober 2006 in der noch anhängigen Rechtssache Kommission/Italien (C-110/05, Nr. 44).

  40 - Siehe auch die vorgenannten Schlussanträge von Generalanwalt Léger vom 5. Oktober 2006, Kommission/Italien (C-110/05, Nr. 46).